According to the British Archives :
The largest rebellion against British rule took place in 1857-58. It was known in Britain as the Indian Mutiny. This was because it began with a rebellion by Indian troops (sepoys) serving in the army of the British East India Company.
The 1857 war is extensively covered in the Indian school books. And every Indian knows it by heart.
Did you know that there is something similar to the "Indian Mutiny" ? It happened a full 25 years after the "Indian Mutiny" of 1857. It has been sighted as the most important event that triggered the Indian independence movement. It single handedly pushed the Indian social class of all colors to take a unified stand against British Rule.
In 1880, the British government appointed George Frederick Samuel Robinson, Earl de Grey and Marquess of Ripon, as Viceroy of British India. As soon as Viceroy Ripon arrived in India, and he set about initiating a major overhaul of the Indian covenanted civil service. During those years, even though Indians were very much part of the civil service, they were not permitted to conduct trials of white defendents in criminal cases. Ripon promptly set about drafting a legislation under which suitably qualified Indians would be allowed to try defendants regardless of the colour of their skin. The legislation was called the Ilbert bill, drafted by Courtenay Peregrine Ilbert, Law member of the Viceroy's council.
Promptly, it kicked up a huge backlash.
The British in India would have nothing to do with anything like this.
The atmosphere became charged up with a volley of inflammatory speeches.
"Under these circumstances is it any wonder that we should protest - if we would say that these men are not fit to rule over us, that they cannot judge us, that we will not be judged by them ?"
"Truly and verily the jackass kicketh at the lion. Show him as you value your liberties, show him that the lion is not dead; he sleepeth, and in God's name, let him dread the awakening."
Viceroy Ripon's reasoning was straight-forward and simple. Was India to be ruled.."for the benefit of the Indian people of all races, classes and creeds or in the sole interest of a small body of Europeans ? "
His reasoning rang no bell nor did the protests die down.
Letters to the editors of leading dailies abounded.
Wrote one to the Englishman -
"One's wife may be walked off for an imaginery offence and...what would more please our fellow subjects - than to bully and disgrace a wretched European woman ?...The higher her husband's station and the greater respectability, the greater the delight of her torturer."
Wrote another to the Madras Mail -
"Are our wives to be torn from our homes on false pretenses to be tried by men who do not respect women, and do not understand us, and in many cases hate us ?...Fancy, I ask you Britishers, her being taken before half-clad native, to be tried and perhaps, convicted..."
Loved by Indians but hated by his own countrymen, the Viceroy finally caved in.
But the damage had already been done. The attitude of the English and the contempt with which the natives were treated by them was now in the open. The blunt and no holds barred backlash had brought in the open what until then was a delicately balanced relationship between the races.
This single act on the part of the British had done irrepairable damage to the foundations and future of the British Raj in India. From now on there was no turning back.
The Indian Mirror said -
"For the first time in modern history, Hindus, Mohammedans, Sikhs, Rajputs, Bengalis, Madrasis, Bombayites, Punjabis, and Purbiahs have united to join a constitutional combination. Whole races and classes, who never before took any interest in the affairs of their country, are taking it now with a zeal and earnestness which more than atone for their former apathy."
Unknowingly the British had lit the fire that caught on to the hearts and minds of the Indians to form the Indian National Consciousness.
Sicked with the backlash and its fallout, an Englishman with the Indian Civil Service, sought to defuse the native anger and discontent. Two years after this incident, he called a meeting of the natives so that it might help them to vent and channel their frustrations.
And thus, the Indian National Congress was born.
The first meeting was attended by stalwarts Motilal Nehru, Janakinath Bose, Dadabhai Naoroji, Ranade, Pherozeshah Mehta, K.T. Telang, Dinshaw Wacha among others in Bombay in the year 1885, the 28th of December.
Said Dadabhai Naoroji, Lahore, 1893 -
"... I am an Indian and owe duty to my work and all my countrymen. Whether I am a Hindu or a Mohammedan, a Parsi, a Christian, or of any other creed, I am above all an Indian. Our country is India and our nationality is Indian."
Allan Octavian Hume is the founder of Indian National Congress.
23 comments:
Few individuals(mostly rich white-farmers grouped to rebel against UK to form the current USA) and we can also identify India's independence movement having similar origin(i.e rich farmers and businessmen)!
I think deriving one's self-esteem via nationality/colour of skin/caste/religion is despicable! Origins of most organizations can be associated to such factors. I guess, 'Indian National Congress' is no exception to that!
Eshwar,
Good post. It goes back to the fact that unless there is a common goal or mission to meet, people never get together. The snobbery of the British in India came to the fore with their backlash against Indian's moving up the elite hierarchy.
It basically enticed the feeling of Evan veetile vandhu evanai adakkure. A simpler analogy (just to indicate the psychological behavior) would be this. Lets say that you let someone stay in your house as a house guest. You keep the house clean, cook etc. But, come the point when the day comes when the guest says that you are no longer fit to collect parcels to your house, that's when you decide that you want to chuck him out!
BTW, Sanchapanzo, I've been trying to comment on your blog. But, as it allows only blogger users to comment, am not able to. Can you change it?
Raman,
Changed the setting as you had suggested.
Sanchapanzo,
As you said the case of the US is also the same. Started off with Britian dumping cheap tea in Boston which hurt the profits of tea smugglers.Which finally paved way for their independence struggle.
Raman,
Your analogy is apt. I would also like point to you an interesting fact that though there were snobbish and arrogant britishers in india, there was also equally good and well meaning ones too. Viceroy Ripon's attempts is a case in point.
Eshwar:
My head isnt just spinning it is revolving:P. I am very impressed with the amount of research you have done for this. I was transported back in time for a few minutes. Thank you for educating me and the thousand others who visit your blog site. To end let me just say one word... AWESOME!
Robbie...many thanks.
True.....
Similarly, we havent read about Indian Caribbeans ..people of Indian origin in South American and African countries in our History lessons who were taken as indentured laborors,but read a lot about Trans Atlantic African Slavery...
Yo !!...I suppose there are still gaps in our history school book.
eashwar
excellent
looking forward to interesting discussions when we meet next time
I thought you were a Diplomat/Politician..When did you become Historian...
Good Blog Dude...
I always felt Guilty for not taking up history lessons seriously..Now I feel very delighted that I was smart enough to ignore them.
Thanks sanchapanzo. Will comment soon :-)
And Rags, don't feel too bad about skipping history lessons. Let me leave you a quote on history that I've always loved.
History is a myth that men agree to believe.
This was quoted by a person who believed in etching his own name in history - Napoleon Bonaparte! So, use history just as a learning instrument imbibing what you desire. Then, write your own history and aeons later that "may" become the "truth"!
Raman
that was awesome and lot of truth to it too. :)
Eashwarji, I have tried my hand at audio blogging so check it out and let me know.
Ganesh,
We can take it up next time we meet and will check out your audio blog.
Raman,
Guess rags is feeling better now !!
Rags,
Dont feel guilty for not concentrating on history, you can more than make it up by reading my blogs !!! Just kidding !
man u have put in a lot of research!!!btw usa is the new imperialist!
Siddarth,
Thank you. BTW, the word imperialist has kind of gone out of fashion now. Super-power will be more like it !!
Eshwar,
Very very informative - for one, i feel happy i skipped history, with so much info coming from your blog ;)
Arvi...thanks sir.
hi eswar i was shocked but not surprised 2 read abt those ads...why just pears then?have u seen fair and lovely adds?they are repulsive!!!they openly say 'dark' ppl are inferior 2 'fair' ppl...let us begin by boycotting these products!!!
fair and lovely !!? everybody is fixated on that product !!
well researched one eashwar.when is the next post due aug 15 th ?? :)
senthil...thanks. Hopefully next one will be before that.
How can u have comments from 2005 for a post of 2007 ?? that too 21 ??
Hey Shiva,
This blog is a are-published one. I have blogged newer ones below this one.
Post a Comment